Considering motions on Gaza (2023-26) (procedural)
Posted by theyvoteforyou.org.au
Posted · Updated
The federal government should suspend the usual procedural rules - known as standing orders - that would otherwise prevent our representatives from considering and voting on motions related to the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023 and which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide
0 support · 0 oppose
How parliament voted
How often each party's members of parliament voted in line with this policy, from They Vote For You.
- Australian Labor Party: voted against – 6% in line with the policy, 73 members
- Liberal Party: voted against – 5% in line with the policy, 46 members
- Australian Greens: voted for – 99% in line with the policy, 15 members
- National Party: voted against – 5% in line with the policy, 14 members
- Liberal National Party: voted against – 3% in line with the policy, 10 members
- Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party: voted against – 11% in line with the policy, 5 members
- Australia's Voice: voted a mixture of for and against – 60% in line with the policy, 1 member
- Centre Alliance: voted against – 4% in line with the policy, 1 member
- Jacqui Lambie Network: voted against – 4% in line with the policy, 1 member
- Katter's Australian Party: voted against – 4% in line with the policy, 1 member
- United Australia Party: voted against – 4% in line with the policy, 1 member
See which party votes like you: Take the policy quiz